Current:Home > ScamsEthermac|California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Prime Money Path
Ethermac|California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-10 18:23:59
SACRAMENTO,Ethermac Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Alabama executes convicted murderer James Barber in first lethal injection since review after IV problems
- The U.S. condemns Russia's arrest of a Wall Street Journal reporter
- Panera rolls out hand-scanning technology that has raised privacy concerns
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Disney blocked DeSantis' oversight board. What happens next?
- Blood, oil, and the Osage Nation: The battle over headrights
- What's the cure for America's doctor shortage?
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik in discussions to meet with special counsel
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Why tech bros are trying to give away all their money (kind of)
- Shifts in El Niño May Be Driving Climates Extremes in Both Hemispheres
- The EPA Placed a Texas Superfund Site on its National Priorities List in 2018. Why Is the Health Threat Still Unknown?
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Even Kate Middleton Is Tapping Into the Barbiecore Trend
- The Young Climate Diplomats Fighting to Save Their Countries
- Hurry! Everlane’s 60% Off Sale Ends Tonight! Don’t Miss Out on These Summer Deals
Recommendation
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Biden asks banking regulators to toughen some rules after recent bank failures
Unexploded bombs found in 1942 wrecks of U.S. Navy ships off coast of Canada
Biden asks banking regulators to toughen some rules after recent bank failures
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
A judge sided with publishers in a lawsuit over the Internet Archive's online library
Elvis Presley’s Stepbrother Apologizes for “Derogatory” Allegations About Singer
Beating the odds: Glioblastoma patient thriving 6 years after being told he had 6 months to live