Current:Home > ContactCalifornia lawsuit says Ralphs broke the law by asking job-seekers about their criminal histories -Prime Money Path
California lawsuit says Ralphs broke the law by asking job-seekers about their criminal histories
View
Date:2025-04-18 16:54:12
LOS ANGELES (AP) — California sued the Ralphs supermarket chain on Thursday, alleging that it violated state law by asking job-seekers whether they had criminal records and illegally rejecting hundreds of applicants.
The California Civil Rights Department contends that Ralphs Grocery Co. “has ignored and continues to ignore” the Fair Chance Act “by screening out otherwise qualified applicants on the basis of criminal histories that do not have any adverse relationship with the duties of the job for which they were applying,” according to a departmental press statement.
The law, which took effect in 2018, was designed to reduce the chance of ex-convicts reoffending by giving them opportunities to earn a living.
In general, employers with five or more workers can’t ask applicants about their criminal histories before making job offers, and must follow specific procedures for rejecting them. The law says employers can’t rescind a job offer if the applicant’s conviction, which could be for a misdemeanor, wouldn’t directly affect job responsibilities.
Instead, Ralphs job-seekers were given what the suit calls a “confusing and misleading” application form that included questions seeking disclosure of their criminal histories. Most candidates who had their job offers revoked weren’t given any way to contact Ralphs to challenge the decision as the law requires, the statement said.
“The instructions provide detailed, superfluous instructions concerning how to report convictions, after telling applicants that they do not need to answer the question. Additionally, by suggesting specific convictions that should not be reported in California, the instructions necessarily suggest that other convictions should be reported,” the lawsuit contends.
Between 2018 and 2022, more than 70% of California applicants answered the question anyway, according to the suit.
Some candidates “lost their job offers based on convictions for a single misdemeanor count of excessive noise. Other applicants who had convictions from other states for simple cannabis possession were also disqualified,” the department’s statement said.
“When roughly 70 million Americans have some sort of record, policies like those employed by Ralphs aren’t just discriminatory and against California law, they don’t make sense,” the department’s director, Kevin Kish, said in the statement. “Ralphs has continued to unlawfully deny jobs to qualified candidates and that’s why we’re taking them to court.”
An email seeking comment from Ralphs’ corporate owner, The Kroger Co., wasn’t immediately returned.
Ralphs has 185 stores in California with about 25,000 employees, according to the lawsuit.
It’s the first lawsuit filed over the law, although the Civil Rights Department has reached settlements with other employers in about 70 other cases alleging violations. They include a $100,000 settlement last year on behalf of applicants who were denied jobs at a construction company.
veryGood! (73)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- A top ally of Pakistan’s imprisoned former premier Imran Khan is released on bail in graft case
- Don't want to lug that couch down the stairs yourself? Here's how to find safe movers
- Oregon man charged in the deaths of 3 women may be linked to more killings: Authorities
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Shop 70% Off Zappos, 70% Off Kate Spade, 70% Off Adidas, 20% Off Tatcha & Memorial Day Deals
- UN maritime tribunal says countries are legally required to reduce greenhouse gas pollution
- Man suffers significant injuries in grizzly bear attack while hunting with father in Canada
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- UN maritime tribunal says countries are legally required to reduce greenhouse gas pollution
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Mariachis. A flame-swallower. Mexico’s disputes between street performers just reached a new high
- Who is Jacob Zuma, the former South African president disqualified from next week’s election?
- Kate Hudson Details “Wonderfully Passionate” Marriage to Ex Chris Robinson
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Head of FEMA tours deadly storm damage in Houston area as more residents get power back
- Turkish Airlines resumes flights to Afghanistan nearly 3 years after the Taliban captured Kabul
- Israel says it will return video equipment seized from AP
Recommendation
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Taylor Swift's Entire Dress Coming Off During Concert Proves She Can Do It With a Wardrobe Malfunction
Analysis: Iran’s nuclear policy of pressure and talks likely to go on even after president’s death
The Real Story Behind Why Kim Kardashian Got Booed at Tom Brady's Roast
Travis Hunter, the 2
Caitlin Clark's Latest Basketball Achievement Hasn't Been Done Since Michael Jordan
Russia is waging a shadow war on the West that needs a collective response, Estonian leader says
Rudy Giuliani pleads not guilty as Trump allies are arraigned in Arizona 2020 election case