Current:Home > MarketsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Prime Money Path
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 07:11:48
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Man granted parole for his role in the 2001 stabbing deaths of 2 Dartmouth College professors
- New report highlights Maui County mayor in botched wildfire response
- A lab chief’s sentencing for meningitis deaths is postponed, extending grief of victims’ families
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- 2024 MLB mock draft: Where are Jac Caglianone, other top prospects predicted to go?
- Rural Texas towns report cyberattacks that caused one water system to overflow
- 911 outages reported in 4 states as emergency call services go down temporarily
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Valerie Bertinelli's apparent boyfriend confirms relationship: 'I just adore her'
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Suspect in fire outside of U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ Vermont office to remain detained, judge says
- Why Cheryl Burke Says Being a Breadwinner Put Strain on Matthew Lawrence Marriage
- Why is the economy so strong? New hires are spending more and upgrading their lifestyles
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Ex-youth center resident testifies that counselor went from trusted father figure to horrific abuser
- Rihanna Reveals Her Ultimate Obsession—And It’s Exactly What You Came For
- These Cookbooks Will Save You From Boring Meals This Summer
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
Nevada Supreme Court rulings hand setbacks to gun-right defenders and anti-abortion activists
Alabama court authorizes executing a man convicted of killing a delivery driver
Maui's deadly wildfires fueled by lack of preparedness, communication breakdowns
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Cheryl Burke recalls 'Dancing With the Stars' fans making her feel 'too fat for TV'
'Harry Potter,' 'Star Wars' actor Warwick Davis mourns death of wife Samantha
Massachusetts IRS agent charged with filing false tax returns for 3 years