Current:Home > reviewsNovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center:Voters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion -Prime Money Path
NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center:Voters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-11 06:19:52
PHOENIX (AP) — Voters in Arizona and NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank CenterMontana will be able to decide in November whether they want to protect the right to an abortion in their state constitutions.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 200-word summary that abortion advocates used to collect signatures for a ballot measure is valid, clearing the way for the issue to remain on the ballot.
Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen on Tuesday certified Montana’s constitutional initiative for the November ballot.
Under both measures, abortions would be allowed until fetal viability — the point at which a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks.
In Arizona, there are some exceptions for post-viability abortions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Montana’s measure allows later abortions if needed to protect the mother’s life or health.
Montana’s initiative would enshrine in the constitution a 1999 state Supreme Court ruling that found the constitutional right to privacy includes the right of a patient to receive an abortion from a provider of their choice. Supporters sought to protect the right as Republican lawmakers passed bills to restrict abortion rights.
Voters in more than a half-dozen states will be deciding abortion measures this fall. The U.S. Supreme Court removed the nationwide right to abortion with a 2022 ruling, which sparked a national push to have voters decide.
“Since Roe was overturned, extreme anti-abortion politicians have used every trick in the book to take away our freedoms and ban abortion completely,” Martha Fuller, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Montana, said in a statement. “During that time, we have been working together to put this issue before voters.”
Recent decisions from the Arizona Supreme Court come ahead of a Thursday ballot printing deadline. Montana’s ballot must be certified by Thursday.
Arizona’s justices sided with Republican lawmakers in a separate case concerning the abortion ballot measure last week to allow a voter information pamphlet to refer to an embryo or fetus as an “unborn human being.” That language will not appear on the ballots.
In another case, the justices ruled a legislative proposal to let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the ballot for voters to decide. The court had rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject.
In the latest abortion measure case, Arizona Right to Life sued over the petition summary, arguing it was misleading.
The high court justices rejected that argument, as well as the claim that the petition summary for the proposed amendment failed to mention it would overturn existing abortion laws if approved by voters. The court in its ruling states that “(r)easonable people” can differ over the best way to describe a key provision of a ballot measure, but a court should not entangle itself in those disputes.
“Regardless of the ruling, we are looking forward to working with our pro-life partners across the state to continue to inform voters about this ambiguous language,” said Susan Haugland, spokesperson for Arizona Right to Life.
Arizona for Abortion Access, which launched the initiative, said the ruling is a “huge win” and advocates will be working around the clock to encourage voters to support it.
“We are confident that this fall, Arizona voters will make history by establishing a fundamental right to abortion in our state, once and for all,” the group said in a statement.
The Arizona secretary of state’s office recently certified 577,971 signatures — far above the number required to put the question before voters.
Democrats have made abortion rights a central message since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 — and it is a key part of their efforts in this year’s elections.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Former TikToker Ali Abulaban Found Guilty in 2021 Murders of His Wife and Her Friend
- Human remains found in jaws of alligator in Houston after woman reported missing
- Comedian Matt Rife Cancels Shows After Unexpected Medical Emergency
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- South Africa’s surprise election challenger is evoking the past anti-apartheid struggle
- Another US MQ-9 Reaper drone goes down in Yemen, images purportedly show
- Key Republican calls for ‘generational’ increase in defense spending to counter US adversaries
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Maradona’s heirs lose court battle to block auction of World Cup Golden Ball trophy
Ranking
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Alabama man set to be executed Thursday maintains innocence in elderly couple's murder
- Officer who arrested Scottie Scheffler criticizes attorney but holds ‘no ill will’ toward golfer
- Stock market today: Asian shares track Wall Street’s retreat
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Massive international police operation takes down ransomware networks, arrests 4 suspects
- South Africa’s president faces his party’s worst election ever. He’ll still likely be reelected
- South Africa’s surprise election challenger is evoking the past anti-apartheid struggle
Recommendation
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Early results in South Africa’s election put ruling ANC below 50% and short of a majority
US District Judge fatally killed in vehicle crash near Nevada courthouse, authorities say
Golden Goose sneakers look used. The company could be worth $3 billion.
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Golden Goose sneakers look used. The company could be worth $3 billion.
Police dismantle pro-Palestinian camp at Wayne State University in Detroit
How Deion Sanders' son ended up declaring bankruptcy: 'Kind of stunning’